Tech Talk #2 Adhesives, Glues, etc.
Let's talk a little
about adhesives and "bonding" of two or more parts to make a
structure. Bonding is simply the "gluing" of materials together
to make a usable product. In "composites" that can be anything
from using Portland cement to bond together sand and rock to make concrete
or epoxy to bond together fiberglass and carbon, plus a bunch of other
things to make a TT Hammer.
Concrete is a little
boring so let's look at monoski applications. First of all, we have to
be sure that everything is compatible. Simply stated the epoxy must bond
well to all parts without causing any undesirable chemical reaction. Obviously
wood glue would bond to the wood core but peal off of the plastic, composite,
metals and fibers. Now, the only way to be absolutely certain is to test
each and everything by itself and in conjunction with the other parts.
We quite often find out that different preparation of the materials will
give distinctly different results than we initially though.
As an example, I
did extensive testing of adhesives for bonding composite panels and aluminum
structures in commercial aircraft interiors. We got some very interesting
results when comparing strength with surface preparation. One would think,
the rougher the surface the better the bond? Don't believe for one minute
that that is a universal truth. In fact it is far from it! With some metals,
a rougher surface gave a significantly lower result in our testing.
So when we build
skis, we test, test and test before we "set it in stone". In
the very rare event that we have a failure of any kind in a ski, we can
track it back and see if there is or was a variance from our specifications.
If not, we are well assured that something outside of our control happened.
An example of this
was two situations where the aluminum tail piece broke out of the ski.
Remember in "Tech Talk #1" I mentioned how epoxy likes to bond
to metals and my reference to "SPS" or Standard Process Specification?
Well here's where it comes into play. We've used the same epoxy formulation
for seven years, have the same fiber for three years, the same aluminum
alloy for eight years and the same SPS for eight years in regard to preparation
and bonding of that part into the ski and the same guy doing it since
we started. Now, I ask the question. After several thousand successful
process repetitions is there likely to be a failure at that point when
everything has stayed the same? Obviously something happened to cause
the failure and from there on it is very easy to track it down.
Let's go further
into bonding and the different types of adhesives and some of the myths
that are flying around out there. I look at adhesives (epoxies) as either
"laminating" low viscosity and use to make a composite part
and "structural" typically high viscosity and used to bond two
structures together or also in repair.
Now, let's dispel
a few myths:
#1- "Fast setting
epoxies are weaker than slow setting epoxies". Not at all and define
"slow" and "fast". It's all in the "chemistry".
There are 90 second cure epoxies that have double the strength of 20 minute
set or 8 hour set epoxies.
#2- "The higher
priced ones are always better" Utter nonsense!! I know of 90 second
cure epoxies that can be purchased off the shelf of you local hardware
store for $1.99 that will blow away the "brand name" competition
at $11.00 for the same amount.
#3- "Thicker
is stronger than thinner" No, not at all true. In testing, we use
several tests of which one is called an "overlap sheer" test.
Simply put, two tabs of metal are overlapped and bonded together. When
the adhesive is cured, we simply pull them apart and measure the results.
I've got some excellent structurall adhesive that are very thick like
Jello and have test results in the 3,000 pounds per square inch that drops
as the part gets colder. On the other hand, I've got a water thin adhesive
that gets stronger as it gets colder and at freezing temperatures has
a test result of an amazing 12,000 pounds per square inch.
It all comes down
to the right material for the right job and follow the manufacturers'
instructions to the "T". I know, it's a "guy thing"
but why not read the instructions first? You know, somebody got paid a
whole lot of money to make all of the same mistake that you are about
to make and he's just trying to save you a little aggravation.
|